Showing posts with label Etiquette and Appropriate Attire. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Etiquette and Appropriate Attire. Show all posts

Monday, May 18, 2020

Etiquette Versus Club Comfort

It was Bernheim in 1904 who, according to the story, so far violated all precedents of summer etiquette, as to dine at the club one evening last summer, in his shirt sleeves. While the attire above may still not be allowed in the club dining room, over one hundred years later, most clubs have relaxed their dress codes a bit and many allow men to dine Informally in their shirt sleeves.


Club Man Dined in Shirt Sleeves
Warm Evening Cause of a Shock for Members
——————————————————
Sharp Note Sent to the Offender Divided Country Organization Into Two Opposing Factions

It is a question of summer etiquette, but it is mighty disturbing to the Century Country Club of White Plains, N. J., even though there are snow drifts on the golf links in the winter wind whipping shrilly up and down the Landers Road. And the question is:
“Ought a perfect gentleman in the presence of ladies, one being his wife, dine at his club on a hot summer’s night in his shirt sleeves? And if he oughtn’t and does, should the house committee, if they also are perfect gentlemen, take the erring member to task in a typewritten letter, dictated to a stenographer?”

Like every great question, this will never be settled until it is settled right.

Question’s Two Sides

The first part of the question has been raised by the house committee, of which Albert M. Wittenberg, wholesale coal dealer, is chairman, which includes Harry H. Meyer, president of the club and member of the stock exchange house of Sellgman & Meyer; Benjamin Stern of Stern Bros.’ dry goods firm, and Harry Rindskoff.

The tail end of the question has been raised by Henry C. Bernheim. It was Bernheim who, according to the story, so far violated all precedents of summer etiquette, as to dine at the club one evening last summer, in his shirt sleeves.

How It All Happened

According to Bernheim’s friends, he and his wife visited the club one afternoon last August. Bernheim played several sets of tennis. When the play was over he and his wife decided to dine at the club, and he ordered the dinner served on the veranda. When it was announced that dinner was ready it appeared to Mr. and Mrs. Bernheim that they were the only members in or about the house. After they sat down Bernheim felt the heat was oppressive and, always mindful of the courtesy due from a husband to his wife, he asked Mrs. Bernheim if she would mind if he dined without his coat. Mrs. Bernheim, having wifely sympathy for her husband, and having, moreover, some real knowledge of how well her husband, who is still one of the younger alumni of Columbia, looked in tennis flannels minus a coat, said she didn't mind in the least.

Finical Male Person About

Therefore Mr. and Mrs. Bernheim had a delightfully comfortable and quiet dinner, supposing they were the only persons except the servants in the building. It happened, however, so Bernheim’s friends assert, that there was a finical male person in the house who is so great a stickler for form that he wouldn't shock himself by appearing even before his wife without a coat. He saw the Bernheims dining and promptly reported to the house committee that the Bemheims were in utter ignorance of the first principles of propriety.

The house committee, or some of its members, particularly Harry H. Meyer, the club's president, were properly shocked and resolved that strong measures should be taken at once. The shirt sleeve habit must be nipped in the bud: It is asserted that the shock sustained by Mr. Meyer was so powerful as to pass clean through him and penetrate the feelings of some of the rest of the committee.

Bernheim Gets a Letter

This would appear to be true, for not long afterward Bernheim received a note typewritten on the club paper, which read in substance as follows:

“Dear Sir— The house committee has been informed that you recently dined at the club in the presence of ladies in your shirt sleeves. This is to inform you that such conduct will not be tolerated.”

The letter was signed with the name of Albert W. Wittenberg, club secretary. Underneath the name was “Per G.” “G,” it is said, was the initial ot the stenographer.

When Bernheim got the letter, he became a good deal hotter than he was on the night of the dinner. He lost no time i
n replying that he felt quite willing to admit it was hardly good form to sit down at dinner in one’s shirt sleeves, but he regarded the language of the letter as highly impertinent.

To this the house committee, or somebody representing it, replied to 
Bernheim that it was impertinent to call the committee’s language impertinent, and asked him to withdraw his impertinent impertinence. Up to a late hour tonight, Bernheim hadn't withdrawn anything. — Los Angeles Herald, 1905




Etiquette Enthusiast, Maura J Graber, is the Site Editor for the Etiquipedia©️ Etiquette Encyclopedia

Saturday, December 30, 2017

1895 Etiquette and Men’s Fashion

“I shall always be an apostle of dress, and I believe firmly in its inexorable etiquette.” — Vogue, 1895


At the New York Horse Show, a few men showed a tendency to appear in very gay waistcoats. Tan and leather ones were popular. Ascot and Teck ties were universally seen and red prevailed, and real yellow gloves were seen in the morning, but of course the evening saw every one in evening dress. 

Vogue remarks: “The collars this year are straight and standing; the all-round turned-down collar is still very popular. Otherwise everywhere there is a disposition to dress less and to avoid conventionalities, and I regret to see it. I shall always be an apostle of dress, and I believe firmly in its inexorable etiquette. There can be no mixing of matters. We must either dress to suit the occasion or we must abandon all hope of being considered gentlemanly. The present revolution in dress is arrant socialism. I am not in favor of it, and I shall fight against it.” — San Francisco Call, 1895


Etiquette Enthusiast, Maura J. Graber, is the Site Editor for the Etiquipedia© Etiquette Encyclopedia

Thursday, February 23, 2017

Etiquette and Appropriate Attire

One can at least dress characteristically, and so bring out the ideals to which one gives adherence. 

One should always have the appearance of being "well-groomed." It is a minor matter to add to habits of personal cleanliness, which every man and woman of refinement adheres to with scrupulous conscientiousness, that attention to the little details and finishing touches of dressing, which give the impression conveyed in that graphic expression "well-groomed." The niceties of life are always matters of small care but great moment.

The aim to be beautiful is a legitimate one, and worthy of the attention of every lover of beauty. To make the most of one's self, both for one's own sake and that of those about one, is a duty. Much can be done if good taste is consulted, and one's salient good points studied and emphasized. One can at least dress characteristically, and so bring out the ideals to which one gives adherence.

For instance, the business woman, in business hours, dresses with that same effort after efficiency and economy of time and strength that she has to put into her business to make it successful. She is, therefore, besides being scrupulously neat, perfectly plainly and yet durably and comfortably dressed. The sudden storm does not catch her unprepared, for she cannot afford to lose even an hour's work next day because she "caught cold." She permits no fussing with her garments, therefore they have to be in perfect working order, as fussing takes time, and time is money. Her hair is done neatly, and as becomingly as possible, but securely for the day.

If, on the other hand, the business woman be a milliner, whose own artistic personality must be her best advertisement, she takes pains to dress artistically even though she wear less serviceable and more elaborate costumes. She should, however, give the same impression of neatness and businesslike serviceableness, with the additional artistic impression which is going to show her customer that she knows how to bring out the telling points in her own personality, and create a charming effect.

The housewife needs, in her choice of morning garments, the same effectiveness as the business woman, for she must also work with real efficiency; but, in addition, she needs to give the impression of homelike abandon, as well as beauty and grace, which shall appear restful. – Edith Ordway, The Etiquette of To-Day, 1918



Etiquette Enthusiast, Maura J Graber, is the Site Editor for the Etiquipedia© Etiquette Encyclopedia

Friday, July 1, 2016

Edward Annoyed by Vest Etiquette

Caricature of Sidney Greville, the Earl of Warwick's brother and  groom-in-waiting to the King.
King Annoyed by Guest's White Vest 

Britain's Ruler Resents Faux Pas 

*****************

Sidney Greville Commits Breach of Etiquette at Dinner — His Majesty Later Graciously Forgives 

LONDON, Feb. 11.— Sidney Grevllle, the Earl of Warwick's brother and groom-in-waiting to the King, is the latest victim of His Majesty's etiquette craze.

Dining the other evening to meet the King, Mr. Greville wore a white waistcoat — an unpardonable faux pas, seeing that the Court is in mourning. The King flung sarcastic remarks at Greville throughout the dinner and was quite angry ,when other guests, including Mrs. Keppel, Lady Essex and Lord Revelstoke, tried to treat the affair in a bantering spirit.

Afterward, when playing bridge, his Majesty sat with his back to Mr. Grevllle to avoid continued sight of the provocative garment.

But the King never harbors resentment, and three days later commanded a dinner party at Grevllle's rooms in St. James' Palace with the same guests. He was most gracious to his host and referred to the waiscoat incident laughingly. Special Cable to The Herald, 1905



🍽Etiquette Enthusiast, Maura J Graber, is the Site Editor for the Etiquipedia© Etiquette Encyclopedia