Showing posts with label Courtroom Attire and Etiquette. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Courtroom Attire and Etiquette. Show all posts

Friday, November 2, 2018

Etiquette and Bell Bottom Blues

Proper court attire is surprisingly still rather “conservative” in this day and age. It was even more so 53 years ago, when “hip-hugger” bell bottom pants were just becoming trendy. An attorney can give the court dress etiquette one should follow. A quick search online found the following, along with tips including that of getting a haircut: “The judge, jury and everyone else in the courtroom will take notice of how you choose to present yourself to the court. You want to show that (a) you respect the courtroom and (b) that you are taking the matter seriously. Whether it is as simple as a contested traffic ticket or more complicated like a medical malpractice case, it is important to dress appropriately for court.” – from CohenJaffe.com, photo source Pinterest

Makes Girl Get a Dress For Decree

LOS ANGELES (UPI) Superior Judge Roger A. Pfaff yesterday objected to the attire and facial contortions of a waitress from nearby Panorama City, but he granted her a divorce anyway. The judge’s ire first was raised when she appeared in court attired in yellow bell bottom, hip - hugging “pajama pants.” “I’m not a stickler on so-called decorum,” said the judge. “But I will not let anyone come into my court and, testify in a pair of pajama pants or pedal pushers. Get yourself dressed up like a lady and I’ll hear your case.” 


The waitress went to a nearby store, bought a dress and returned. When she re-entered the courtroom, she apparently made a face and the judge thought she had struck out her tongue. Pfaff ordered her from the courtroom a second time, telling her attorney to “explain to her that you don’t make faces at judges.” Attorney Edwin Saul conferred with his client and explained to the judge that his client had wrinkled her nose at the thought of paying $11.47 for the dress. The judge then agreed to her case. She said her husband came home late at night. Pfaff granted the divorce. – La Habra Star, 1965


Etiquette Enthusiast, Maura J Graber, is the Site Editor for the Etiquipedia© Etiquette Encyclopedia

Wednesday, July 6, 2016

19th C. Supreme Court Etiquette

Certain forms and ceremonies are necessary, and the dignity of the Supreme Court must be maintained. In other words, a certain etiquette must be maintained.

Extreme Court Etiquette 

The etiquette of the Supreme Court at Washington is a great deal severer than that of our Court of Appeals in this city. A correspondent of the Philadelphia Press gives an idea of the rules prevailing as follows : 

I happened to drop into the United States Supreme Court the other day, and there I met a distinguished Philadelphia lawyer. He was in the blackest and shiniest of broadcloth from bis head to his heels. He held in his hand a tall hat, a small black necktie encircled the whitest of collars, and his general appearance suggested a funeral. 

As this gentleman (I dare not name him) is somewhat noted for his rather flashy attire, I could not exactly understand what was the matter, especially as he had no crape on his hat. He noticed me eyeing him and asked what was the matter. I told him he looked more like a Baptist preacher than a Philadelphia lawyer. “Oh,” he answered quickly, “it's this darned Court.”

“I hate these clothes, and at home I never wear anything but grays or stripes and plaids, with bright neckties, but the last time I had a case in this Court, I was not allowed to make my argument because I wore a short, speckled coat and trousers, with a blue necktie. I was told that I was not properly dressed to appear before this Court, and that I must wear black clothes. I have another case here now and so you see, I am dressed in this outlandish style. But I shall charge this suit to my client, and when I get home I'll have my wife put these things away in camphor and mark them ‘Supreme Court.’” 

Upon inquiry I found, what I never knew before, that the Supreme Court forbids lawyers to wear within its bar anything but black. The weather may be as hot as the region toward which all of us sinners are tending, but no grateful seersucker or linen duster, or white duck is permissible. 

The nine old duffers in easy chairs may nod and snooze, and have their ease, but you must dress in black. It is probably right, for certain forms and ceremonies are necessary, and the dignity of the Court must be maintained. — Sacramento Daily Union, 1883



Etiquette Enthusiast, Maura J Graber, is the Site Editor for the Etiquipedia© Etiquette Encyclopedia