Showing posts with label King George V. Show all posts
Showing posts with label King George V. Show all posts

Friday, April 7, 2023

Royal Protocol Changed for President

Those in charge of the details of the arrangements, particularly the officials at Buckingham Palace, are at times puzzled over the niceties of etiquette, the result of the unique situation that there be no Royal guest at the palace. 
Public domain image of Buckingham Palace
Plans for President in London
The “Belgium Suite” Will Be Occupied by Mr. and Mrs. Wilson While Guests of King George at Buckingham Palace, and the Matter of Etiquette Has Been Simplified  

London, Dec- 23.—The “Belgium Suite” of Buckingham Palace, reserved exclusively for Royal guests until now, will be occupied by President and Mrs. Wilson during their stay in London. In the years of its interesting history it has had within its halls many crowned heads, one of the latest but least mentioned being the former German Emperor. It was given its name during Queen Victoria's reign. 
At the request of President Wilson, who evidently found too much is being crowded into his short stay in England, the proposed dinner at Manchester House Saturday night has been eliminated. 

Those in charge of the details of the arrangements, particularly the officials at Buckingham Palace, are at times puzzled over the niceties of etiquette, the result of the unique situation that there be no Royal guest at the palace. The puzzle, however, has been only momentary, except among some of the attendants, who have been casting about for guidance. It is understood that they have been informed that it will be plain “Mr. Wilson and Mrs. Wilson,” much to their relief.— Associated Press, 1918


🍽Etiquette Enthusiast, Maura J. Graber, is the Site Editor for the Etiquipedia© Etiquette Encyclopedia

Thursday, December 10, 2020

Etiquette Changed for WWI


And George V also wanted Brits to quit drinking alcohol during WWI — “It is no longer according to etiquette to place any wines or liquors on the table whenever King George is a guest at military messes or with the fleet, says The Spectator, which is conducting an active campaign for prohibition during the war.“


The King's Host's Also Abstain

No Wines or Liquors at Messes Where George is Guest


London, March 30— It is no longer according to etiquette to place any wines or liquors on the table whenever King George is a guest at military messes or with the fleet, says The Spectator, which is conducting an active campaign for prohibition during the war.

The King's order, barring the use of alcoholic beverages in his palaces during the war, is being adhered to rigidly. No wine is served, even at dinner parties at Buckingham Palace or at Windsor.

The Spectator recalls the fact that after the King's accident in France, when he was thrown from his horse, his physicians prescribed a small amount of wine. As soon as the doctors orders were withdrawn, however, the King renewed his abstinence. The New York Times, 1917


Etiquette Enthusiast, Maura J Graber, is the Site Editor for the Etiquipedia© Etiquette Encyclopedia

Sunday, August 25, 2019

Royal Stamp of Approval

The new Queen received a royal stamp of approval. It was the first time that a Queen of England, not reigning in her own right, had appeared on British stamps. 

The Coronation stamp of Great Britain, bearing quarter-length portraits of the new King and Queen side by side, is approximately the size of the Silver Jubilee adhesives issued in 1935 to honor George V. Between the rulers is an Imperial Crown under which are the initials G and E entwined with R. In the lower border is the date, “12 May 1937,” with “Postage Revenue” in the upper part of the frame, and “11/2 d” in each lower corner. It is the first time that a Queen of England, not reigning in her own right, has appeared on British stamps. 
The only other Queen illustrated was Victoria, who always was shown, even on issues coming out soon before her death, as she appeared in her younger days, due to the prevailing etiquette concerning such matters. Almost simultaneously with the Coronation stamp – there will be only one value for Great Britain – the King George V issue to replace the Edward VIII stamps being put on sale. These stamps carry the profile of the new King facing left, with the Crown above. In the corners are a rose, shamrock, thistle and daffodil. – The Sun, 1937


Etiquette Enthusiast, Maura J Graber, is the Site Editor for the Etiquipedia© Etiquette Encyclopedia

Monday, August 5, 2019

Royal Dining Etiquette Brief

It is not etiquette to eat while the King is not doing so. Due to the King’s shorter dinners in 1913, a third of the wine was not drunk that used to be drunk at fashionable British tables.

King’s Dinner Guests Drinking Less Wine Now

Ruler, an Indigestion Sufferer, Causes Banquets to be Much Shorter

Dinners grow shorter each season. King Edward VII was the first to set the cult of the brief dinner and King George V, who, in spite of the greatest care, is still dyspeptic, cuts them shorter still, as he does not taste half the courses and consequently it is not etiquette to eat while the King is not doing so. A third of the wine is not drunk that used to be drunk at fashionable tables.– London, 23 February, 1913


Etiquette Enthusiast, Maura J Graber, is the Site Editor for the Etiquipedia© Etiquette Encyclopedia  

Saturday, June 2, 2018

Royal Court Etiquette Ignorance

Whoops! In her first invitation the Duchess intimated that a semi-Court costume would be sufficient, but afterward she sent another card asking those she had invited, to come in full uniform. But alas, for the Duchess of Westminster, only the King himself has the privilege in this dominion of demanding full Court dress, as the Duchess herself was informed very quickly by the Lord Chamberlain. 

’Twas a Fearful Mistake to Make, Don’t Ye Know

London—The Duchess of Westminster has come into humiliating conflict with the Royal Court by asking her guests to appear in full Court dress at the Royal ball she is to give in her own residence. In her first invitation the Duchess intimated that a semi-Court costume would be sufficient, but afterward she sent another card asking those she had invited, to come in full uniform. This would be necessary, she explained, because so many foreign Royalties would be present, in addition to the British King and Queen. But alas, for the Duchess of Westminster, only the King himself has the privilege in this dominion of demanding full Court dress, as the Duchess herself was informed very quickly by the Lord Chamberlain. Full Court costume, this functionary reminded her, is never worn at any private party. 

The Duchess pleaded ignorance of the Royal regulations, whereupon she got a hint that King George and Queen Mary think no Duchess of the realm should should be so lamentably unacquainted with Court etiquette. The result of the incident was that the Duchess ordered her second cards to be cancelled, but she showed, nevertheless, no inclination to place herself in so humiliated a position before her guests. The King could not well withdraw his own and the Queen’s acceptance of the invitation as the foreign Royalties and others had been especially invited to meet George and Mary. The upshot of it is that His Majesty has caused it to be known that he does not expect full Court costume to be worn at the Duchess of Westminster’s Royal ball. The Duchess got up the ball at the request of the King, so while she knows she blundered, she says she feels accordingly vexed at his Majesty’s interference. - San Pedro Daily News, 1911



Etiquette Enthusiast, Maura J Graber, is the Site Editor for the Etiquipedia© Etiquette Encyclopedia

Thursday, January 11, 2018

Puzzling “Niceties of Etiquette”

Though the King and his family were not in attendance for dinner, President and Mrs. Wilson were photographed with the British Royal Family at Buckingham Palace, in 1918

Mr. and Mrs. Wilson Will Occupy “Belgian Suite” While in London; Some Puzzled Over Niceties of Etiquette

“The Belgian suite,” reserved exclusively for Royal guests until now, will be occupied by President and Mrs. Wilson during their stay in London. In the years of its interesting history, it has had within its walls many Crowned Heads, one of the latest, but the least mentioned at Buckingham Palace, being the former German Emperor. It was given its name during Queen Victoria’s reign, and was always known as the “House of the King of the Belgians,” when Royalty was entertained here. 

At the request of President Wilson, who evidently found that too much is being crowded into his short stay in England, the proposed dinner at Lancaster House Saturday night has been eliminated. This was to have been a function only second to the banquet at Buckingham Palace Friday night. Instead of the Lancaster House banquet, Premier Lloyd George will entertain the President at dinner Saturday, to meet the War Cabinet. 

Those in charge of the arrangements, particularly the officials at Buckingham Palace, are puzzled at times over the niceties of etiquette, the result of the unique situation that there will be no Royal guests at the Palace. These puzzles, however, have been only of momentary duration, except among some of the aged attendants who have been casting about for guidance. It is understood that they have been informed that it will be plain “Mr. Wilson” and “Mrs. Wilson,” much to their relief. – Sacramento Union, 1918

Etiquette Enthusiast, Maura J. Graber, is the Site Editor for the Etiquipedia© Etiquette Encyclopedia

Saturday, December 30, 2017

The Etiquette Sharps on Royal Titles

The question arose as to the etiquette of a U.S. President, and how he should address royalty.

Calls One King “Sir,” and Another, “Your Majesty”

Washington, Jan. 16 —Why did President Wilson, in replying to the speech of King George V of England, call his Royal host “Sir,” while in a similar position with King Victor of Italy he used the expression “Your Majesty.” The sharps on etiquette and Royal Court procedure noted the differences in form, and while granting either was correct from one ruler to another, were at a loss to account for the difference. What is, at least, the most probable explanation was furnished by an Italian attache, who said that what was probably in the President’s mind was that “Sir” rendered into Italian, might be retranslated as “Mister.” In using the “King's English” to an English King, there was not the same danger. – Los Angeles Herald, 1919



Etiquette Enthusiast, Maura J. Graber, is the Site Editor for the Etiquipedia© Etiquette Encyclopedia

Tuesday, December 12, 2017

Obsolete Royal Court Etiquette

The Royals at the Empire Exhibition – This was the first time he was induced to speak for “distribution” — due mainly to obsolete Court etiquette, which had always required the Sovereign’s words to be conveyed strictly and literally by “word of mouth” (and hearing.)
  
Out with the Old and In with the New!

King George to Talk by Radio 

LONDON, April 22 (United Press)—Britain’s great $100,000,000 “empire boosting” exhibition will be officially opened tomorrow by King George —appropriately enough on St. George’s Day, the feast of England’s patron saint. For the benefit of those unable to attend the opening ceremony, King George's speech will be broadcasted by wireless — the first time the British Monarch has been broadcasted. 


Elaborate ceremonial will mark the opening, and the general public admitted at the scheduled price of one shilling, and expence will be strictly marshalled to conform with the occasion. Wemberley Park being some eight miles from Buckingham Palace, the Royal party will motor the greater part of the distance, changing into state carriages drawn by four horses about a quarter of a mile from the exhibition. 

The King is immensely interested in the arrangements for broadcasting for, although a wireless fan, this was the first time he has been induced to speak for “distribution” — due mainly to obsolete Court etiquette, which has always required the Sovereign’s words to be conveyed strictly and literally by “word of mouth” (and hearing.) The Royal party will also witness a section of the “Pagent of Empire,” depicting the history of the British race and the growth of the empire, and make hasty tour of the exhibition. – Madera Tribune, 1924

Etiquette Enthusiast, Maura J. Graber, is the Site Editor for the Etiquipedia© Etiquette Encyclopedia 

Sunday, December 10, 2017

Royal Etiquette Dos and Don’ts

A King never writes a letter to anybody outside his family circle. All other correspondence has to be conducted through one of his secretaries. Nor does King George accept invitations to dine or stop with a subject. What he does when he wishes to pay such a visit, is to invite himself. Another strictly observed point of etiquette, is that on ascending the throne, a King shall withdraw from any clubs to which he has hitherto belonged.

Royal Etiquette
In England it Assumes a Number of Curious Phases

Things the King Cannot Do... 
He is Barred from Accepting Gifts From Individuals, He May Not Belong to a Club and May Not Marry Without Parliament's Consent

It may sound a little curious, but there are quite a number of things which, despite his exalted position as Sovereign of the Realm, King George V cannot do. These disabilities range over all sorts of matters and concern etiquette, politics, religion and law. To begin with etiquette. It is an established practice that His Majesty must never call upon or grant an audience to a foreign Monarch except in the presence of a responsible minister. Etiquette also precludes him from accepting a gift which a loyal subject may wish to make him. Should, however, the gift be a joint offering, the prohibition does not apply. This enables a King George to accept gifts which are subscribed for by a number of people together.

A K
ing never writes a letter to anybody outside his family circle. All other correspondence has to be conducted through one of his secretaries. Nor does King George accept invitations to dine or stop with a subject. What he does when he wishes to pay such a visit, is to invite himself. Another strictly observed point of etiquette, is that on ascending the throne, a King shall withdraw from any clubs to which he has hitherto belonged. Similarly he cannot become a Free Mason, and if he happens to be one at the date of his ascension, he must resign from the craft. King George, however, has not been initiated.

Even in affairs of the heart a sovereign must bow to the will of others. Although King Cophetua might have loved and shared his throne with a beggar maid, the Royal Marriage Act would render the occurrence of any such romantic union impossible in England. Members of the blood royal must have the sanction of Parliament before they can marry, and this would certainly not be accorded unless the birth and position of the lady were beyond reproach.

An English King's position toward the law is somewhat peculiar. Theoretically, he is above the law. In practice, however, he has to obey it, just as have his subjects. He must observe the established legal system of the country. Any royal proclamation which he issues, is only binding in so far as it is founded upon an existing law. It cannot alter the common law or create a new offense, nor can a King set up private tribunals, such as the Star Chamber, or add to the jurisdiction of a court by a special act of Parliament, it has also been decided that if his Majesty were to lose an action brought against him by the revenue authorities, he would be liable for the payment of costs.

By the law of the land the King cannot possibly commit an offense. Any injury or wrong suffered by a subject at his hands has to be attributed to the “mistake of his advisers;” hence it happens that King George is the only person in Great Britain who cannot arrest a suspected felon, even if such a one were to be seen by him entering Buckingham Palace or Windsor Castle. The reason for this is because no action for wrongful arrest could lie against him, and therefore if the person arrested by him were proved innocent there would then be a wrong without a remedy. Another legal disability of the King is that he is barred of all rights in matters relating to land after a lapse of sixty years. He is also prohibited from serving on a jury or from giving evidence.

Until so comparatively recent a period as 1870 if a subject were convicted of treason or felony, the King could claim his property. Another lapsed prerogative of the crown is one known as “corody.” During its existence, a King who wanted to advance the interests of a royal chaplain could compel a bishop to support such a clergyman until a benefice had been found for him. Nowadays, he has not even the right of founding a bishopric or creating ecclesiastical jurisdiction. Similarly he must always be a member of the Church of England and cannot change his religion.

The theory that the King “reigns, but does not govern” is amply borne out by the political system of the country. While the members of Parliament are his Majesty's “faithful commons,” they have certain privileges which he himself does not possess. Thus, King George can summon or prorogue Parliament at will, but he cannot prolong it beyond a definite period. Similarly he is absolutely debarred from imposing any sort of taxation whatever without first securing the consent of Parliament. 

So jealously guarded is this privilege that a King cannot create new officers with new fees or annex new fees to existing officers, as such a course would be considered as imposing a fresh tax. In bygone times, however, when an English Monarch was in want of funds, he would levy taxes right and left and without asking anybody. The franchise does not extend to English monarchs. King George is one of the few men possessing a genuine stake in the country without the privilege of recording a vote. — London Bellman, 1911


Etiquette Enthusiast, Maura J. Graber, is the Site Editor for the Etiquipedia© Etiquette Encyclopedia


Thursday, October 19, 2017

Applauding Royal Court Etiquette

An Italian coloratura soprano of great international fame, Madame Tetrazzini's voice was remarkable for its phenomenal flexibility, thrust, steadiness and thrilling tone. She enjoyed a highly successful operatic and concert career in the U.S and Europe, from the late Victorian Era to the 1920s.

In her last year of residence in America, Madame Tetrazzini, has added much to her English speaking attainments and she now acquits herself delightfully in general conversations. She is persistent in using English words and when these fail her, her dramatic art is brought into use and she acts out the word. As we pulled into the station on the way to Los Angeles the bell on the engine clanged monotonously and she was reminded that in Italy the bells hang in church towers, "We have no bells on our trains there,” she said, "but only" and then the word "whistle," not coming readily to her tongue, she puckered up her lips and emitted a low, melodious imitation of a train whistle. 

Describing her Continental experience last summer the diva mentioned her singing at the opera during the coronation ceremonies in London, She described the wonderful floral decorations of the theater itself and then the astounding display of jewels as they appeared upon English royalty and the men and women representing the foreign courts during that remarkable pageant. The jewelled headresses of the Indian princes, Maharajas and other notables received vivid description from the singer and then she alluded laughingly to the incident of her own appearance when despite Court decorum and in defiance of rules of etiquette, the King and Queen clapped their hands enthusiastically and brought forth a demonstration of applause otherwise unheard of in that performance. Madame Tetrazzini explained that applause on such grand occasions is not customary and occurs only when led by the members of the royal family, so that her ovation earned an extra fame for her. “They said I had a wonderful claque,” said she, "with the King of England to lead it.” – Los Angeles Herald, 1912


🍽Etiquette Enthusiast, Maura J Graber of The RSVP Institute of Etiquette, is the Site Editor for the Etiquipedia© Etiquette Encyclopedia