Showing posts with label Russian Dining History. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Russian Dining History. Show all posts

Sunday, July 7, 2024

Etiquette and the Russian Zakuski Table



One of the distinctive features of Russian hospitality that attracted the attention of visitors and travelers – including King Edward VII who brought the custom of appetizers back to England after traveling to Russia as the first reigning British monarch to visit the Russian Empire – and was described in detail in memoirs of the 19th century was the snack table or “zakusochny stol.” Snacks and how they were served was initially one of the specific features of Russian cuisine.

For the first time, the concept of this display of  “snack foods” appears during the Great Troubles, after the death of Tsar Ivan IV the Terrible, when the Polish prince Vladislav found himself on the Russian throne. It was then, especially for him, who was not Orthodox and, accordingly, who did not know the rules and customs, that a “list of royal dishes” was drawn up from 1610-1613. It is not possible to determine the order of serving in that source, since it is compiled on a different principle and is more concerned with the religious aspects of the feast and food consumption. It is logical here that not knowing the local rules of behavior, or etiquette at the table, instantly made a newcomer with great ambitions a stranger. This was clear even then.

Until the 17th century in Russia, a “snack” (Zakuski) meant any food that was convenient or customary to eat with the main course. A snack, that way. could be a piece of bread served with hot food, for example, meat. Or, for example, sweets that help neutralize the nasty taste of the medicine. According to V.V. Pokhlebkin, a famous researcher of Russian and other cuisines, until the 17th century, the word “snack” was synonymous with breakfast. “Snack – In high society: breakfast before lunch, vodka with salty and other foods; sometimes early lunch: birthday appetizer; among the people, multiple snacks are more common: dessert, appetizer, super filling, delicacies, sweets, gingerbreads.” — Dahl's Explanatory Dictionary. — 1863–1866.

There were many foreigners in 19th century in Russia who noted a rule that surprised them. This was not typical for other countries. Some time before sitting down at the table and starting lunch/dinner, snacks were served in a separate room on special tables. It was not something small and not filling; many foreigners believed that this was the entire dinner or lunch program and were somewhat surprised when they were invited later to the main table. German traveler Christian Müller put it this way: “Russian snacks served before lunch are more expensive than German lunch.”

Or here’s another quote: “it is customary to serve some light food before the main meal - right in the living room, a quarter of an hour before sitting down at the table; this preliminary treat - a kind of breakfast that turns into lunch - serves to stimulate the appetite and is called in Russian, unless I heard incorrectly, “appetizer”. The servants serve plates on trays with fresh caviar, which is eaten only in this country, with smoked fish, cheese, salted meat, crackers and various cookies, sweet and savory; they also serve bitters, vermouth, French vodka, London porter, Hungarian wine and Danzig balsam; They all eat and drink it while standing, walking around the room. A foreigner who does not know local customs and does not have a very strong appetite may well get enough of all this, after which he will sit as a simple spectator for the entire dinner, which will turn out to be completely unnecessary for him. –Traveler A. Custine in, “Russia in 1839”

If drinking coffee in another room or at least at another table was considered decent everywhere in Europe, then separating snacks from the main meal and serving them separately and in advance had become a highlight of Russian etiquette. They did not sit at the snack table; they drank and ate while standing. And, by the way, not in a hurry. Plates of appetizers were held in their hands. I read that it happened that the snack table was made higher than usual, so that it would be clear and so that none of the guests would think of moving a chair to it. And in some houses, snacks were transferred to individual plates by servants, waiting for the signal “enough,” but quickly, perhaps to avoid the crowd around the snack bar, self-service became fashionable.

I want to emphasize that the desire of a guest, for example, out of ignorance, to immediately sit down at the dinner table, bypassing the snack bar, was considered terribly rude, however, and as they are very fond of exclaiming now, “not according to etiquette” – “not comme il faut,” an absolute “bad manners,” in general, that “etiquette forbade it.” This was highly undesirable.

Therefore, in L.N. Tolstoy’s novel “Resurrection,” the father of the girl whom Nekhlyudov had designs on immediately stopped such an unethical attempt. “He apologized for being late and wanted to sit in the empty place at the end of the table between Missy and Katerina Alekseevna, but old man Korchagin demanded that, if he no longer drinks vodka, he would still have a snack at the table.”

In France, it is said, snacks appeared at the end of the 16th century in the royal kitchen. As a result, as many as four French words were combined into Russian - “snacks.” Hors d’oeuvre, entree, entrements, relevee and, albeit slightly from a different category, amuse-bouche, can be translated, with varying degrees of preservation of the nuances, as appetizers. But what is very, very important here, French rules interpreted appetizers as something additional and accompanying. Until the mid-19th century, appetizers in France were served not before the start of the feast, but during lunch, in the intervals between main courses or in addition to them. These could, as a rule, be different meals, or they could be part of one.

Around 1860, the Russian system of serving snacks, began to spread in France. This fact is recorded in the French gastronomic encyclopedia Larousse Gastronomique, published in 1938. The first and main supporter and PR man of Russian snacks in the West was the famous French chef Jurben Dubois (1818–1901), who worked at one time in Russia and apparently fell in love with the local practice. The custom of serving snacks before meals, brought by Dubois from Russia, seemed to the French worthy of attention and borrowing, ans he was famous and respected at home. Naturally, but in some places the idea was somewhat transformed, mainly by reducing the quantity served and the range of what was offered.

But time did not stand still gradually, because not all guest rooms had enough, snacks first moved to the dining room, closer to the main table, and then... to the main table. The resulting hybrid, however, also had authoritative opponents. Auguste Escoffier wrote in his culinary guide: “Hospitable hosts and head waiters, rather fussy and zealous than thoughtful, introduced the fashion for snacks in our country, without taking into account the peculiarities of the climate, the fact that we have different national traditions, tastes, habits and temperament. They began to serve these “snacks” on the same tables where people later had dinner, which was already a violation of tradition.

So appetizers, originally Russian, entered the main European menu and began to be served directly to the table at the beginning of the meal. I don’t want to say that this is the only explanation, in cases such as this it’s always a whole bouquet or factors and traditions. One that comes to mind is the Swedish 
Smörgåsbord, but the fact that the snacks were on the menu at the beginning of the meal definitely has a Russian origin story.


Our newest contributor, Kseniia Markova, is a specialist in European social etiquette.  Project creator and author for ETIQUETTE748, Kseniia won a national award in the field of protocol, image and etiquette, “For contributions to the development and popularization of the profession” for quality content that supports the ETIQUETTE748 project - 2018; National Award in the field of protocol and etiquette, winner in the category “Best educational project in the field of etiquette” -2022. She is a holder of diplomas and certificates from leading schools and teachers in Europe. (including: Institut Villa Pierrefeu, Debrett’s Academy, The Minding Manners etc... She is the author of several books, including, “European Etiquette: Conversations about good manners and subtleties of behavior in society,” and “Etiquette. Traditions and history of romantic relationships,” and “Dress code: Etiquette and classics as ways of self-expression.” In 2022, this book won an award as the best in the field of etiquette. She is a member of the National Association of Protocol Specialists (NASP)


 🍽️Etiquette Enthusiast, Maura J. Graber, is the Site Editor for the Etiquipedia© Etiquette Encyclopedia

Sunday, November 26, 2017

Etiquette and Gluttony in Russia

The full story of feasting enjoyed by Royal gluttons comes from the pen of a methodical Chef de Cuisine, a Frenchman in the service of Catherine II of Russia. He writes of almost unbelievable quantities of food, prepared and served by a small army of his assistants roasting cooks, spit-turners, pastry chefs, fish cooks and makers of entremets –– a grand total of 500 workers in the royal kitchens!

GLUTTONS and gourmets through the centuries have had similar tastes and capacities, and between the capacious eaters of today and famous trenchermen of history there is little difference. One thing all have in common, an incredible desire to consume vast quantities of rare and exotic food but if the shades of famous European chefs could peer over the starched white caps and shoulders of a modern cook, they would undoubtedly give startled shudders of disappointment at the menus of today.

“Why! These fellows have an easy task! Their menus do not compare to the great feasts given by our royal masters Kings and Queens who knew what good food meant!” Chagrined and amazed that the world has forgotten a tradition of feasting brought down through generations of gourmands, these skilled and proud chefs of a vanished world might conclude that human stomachs of this era have astonishingly diminished in size appetites have wilted and that no one knows how to enjoy fine food and plenty of it. Modern scientists give a somewhat different reason for the sad state into which old-fashioned feasting has fallen. Actual capacity, they say, is no smaller, but conditions have changed and men and women, no matter how blessed by wealth and leisure, have learned not to “eat themselves into the grave.”


Too much food at any one time amounts to no more than a primitive gorging, a habit which has come down from the time of cavemen who never knew when the next meal could be had. And in the hurried activities of modern life people cannot “sleep off” a great feast, as they could and did a century or more ago. “Heavy feasting,” say dieticians, “overloads not only the stomach but slows down the brain.” And this the successful business man and active woman cannot afford. Yet the fashion of small, selected menus -- for health's sake was not always so. Out of the past come tales of the mighty feats of rulers and generals, gentlemen of quality and dainty ladies assessed of palates and capacities unequalled since their time. 


True accounts of swashbuckling Counts and frivolous Countesses, proud Princes and Princesses who valued as a high accomplishment their ability to taste and consume amazing quantities of food and drink. There come Royal trenchermen ––two bottle, three bottle, and even four bottle men who thought nothing of quaffing that amount of old port after an evening’s full measure of sherry or sack, hock, bordeaux, burgundy and champagne and who later repaired to a late session of Parliament and delivered speeches that altered the destiny of nations. To these statesmen tremendous quantities of food and drink proved but a small handicap, because then they retired for a few days of rest and fasting.
 

The full story of feasting enjoyed by Royal gluttons comes from the pen of a methodical Chef de Cuisine, a Frenchman in the service of Catherine II of Russia. He writes of almost unbelievable quantities of food, prepared and served by a small army of his assistants roasting cooks, spit-turners, pastry chefs, fish cooks and makers of entremets –– a grand total of 500 workers in the royal kitchens!

Being French, this chef knew the story of Le Grand Vatel, commander of the kitchen of Louis XIV –– the poor cook who threw himself on his sword when the costermonger failed to bring the fish on time for one of Louis the Glutton's feasts. Knowing the uncertain temper of royal masters and the fate of careless chefs, Catherine's head cook took precautions against mistakes. He wrote out each menu in great folios, and made sure that every portion of the feast arrived hours in advance of the designated hour. Today these historic and colorful records are preserved in the archives of the ancient Hermitage, Catherine the Great’s favorite residence where the vast dining hall resounded to hoarse toasts, merry tales, and the boisterous laughter of courtiers.

An unestimated variety of “snacks” were first served with vodka, almost a meal that preceded the feast itself, but these appetizers were on old tradition, mere “palate-ticklers“ to whet the hunger of strong men. And Catherine’s chef thought so little of their importance that he fails to mention them. Nor does her chef say much of the rare wines served with each course, or the list of imported beverages stored in the Royal cellars, yet some account of these, fortunately, comes from other Slavic sources.

An afternoon’s refreshment might well be several bottles per head of a delicious light wine, just as a cooler and “pepper-upper.” Or of vodka, six or seven “captains”–– a glass the size of a sherry glass –– before a meal. And if such a potation was mere refreshment, a pleasant interlude in the serious business of making love or quarreling, what did these people do when they settled down to important eating and drinking? The menu of one of Catherine's “small dinners” not a great court banquet, just a little dinner en famille, perhaps for Potemkin or for Orloff, with a few young officers of the guard and ladies in waiting to fill out the board:

  • Ten light soups, such as consommes, broths, essence of vegetables, light cream soups. With these, a glass or two of sherry for the ladies a bottle or more for the men. 
  • Twenty-four different entremets, such as pheasant, goose, rabbit, chicken, quail and so on. Just a little something to whet the appetite for the rest of the meal. And with these a light red wine from France or Greece. 
  • Thirty-two tid-bits, such as marinated baby chicken, bird wings with parmesan, rolled chicken skin, lamb fries and other exotic dainties. With each, a different light wine. 
  • The great soups, Borshtch, cabbage soup with sour cream, fish soup, cold soup made from cucumbers and beer, spinach soup with sour cream and other noble liquids. Here a dry Italian or Spanish wine was considered quite the thing. 
  • The fish : a dozen or more varieties, such as sturgeon, carp, salmon, pike, greyling, cod and halibut. Trout, too, the famous fruit au bleu cooked in vinegar to color the skin a delicate azure. And here began the drinking of noble wines, preferably a white burgundy or a dry moselle. 
  • Fried chicken with truffles. This course stood by itself. To wash it down one of the heady wines of the Rhineland, such as Johannesberer Schloss or Forsteter Kirchensturk. 
  • Thirty-two more entremets, among them, becasse a l’Espagne, turtle, pheasant and other wild fowl, young pigeons with crawfish. A light red wine from Bordeaux or Greece. 
  • The roasts! Ah. here is where your true trencherman found delight. Great sirloins of beef, wild goat, venison, eight different sauces, twelve salads. And to accompany them the noblest of all red wines, the rare vintage of Burgundy the wine wc know as Chambertin. From this point the "small dinner" begins to taper off. The heavy courses are finished. 
  • Next come 25 hot and cold dishes, such as thinly sliced ham, tongue, cauliflower and the more exotic vegetables and champagne, of course. 
  • Then 32 more roasts of the lighter variety, veal, lamb, mouton des prés salés and suckling pig. Again, a red wine, such as Chateau Neuf du Pape or Hermitage from the banks of the Rhone. 
  • The desserts. Any quantity of them. Pastries, cheeses, fruits, puddings and ices. With these champagne or Tokay. 
  • And later in the evening, tea with conserves, brandy and port. 
Catherine's favorites, of course, aped their Empress. Potemkin's establishment rivaled hers. He kept ten chefs, each of whom had his own specialties, and under them worked 240 helpers. It is to him that gluttons owe the record of dishes Catherine liked best boiled beef with salted cucumbers and cucumbers stuffed with nuts, peppers, ginger, etc. Potemkin liked to surprise his ruler with unusual dainties and he searched the world for them, Once, he served boiled reindeer tongues as the principal dish of the dinner. Strogonoff, another favorite of the Empress, was a valiant knight of the glistening table cloth. He gave dinners in the Roman fashion, patterning his feasts after Lucullus, placing his guests on couches. When Potemkin brought out reindeer tongues, he went him one better and served reindeer lips. Bear paws and fried porcupine were among his favorite dishes. And he introduced oysters to Russia. 

When Strogonoff invited guests to dinner he conducted them first into steaming hot Turkish baths and there they were served pressed caviar. Then his guests were conducted to couches around the brilliant board. The plate was of gold. Two enormous crystal chandeliers were suspended above the table. The centerpiece was a human skull filled with vodka, and from this the guests drank a loving cup with their host, proposing Lucullus' toast “Memento mori!”(Remember death!) – John Clayton in San Bernardino Sun, 1937


🍽️Etiquette Enthusiast, Maura J. Graber of The RSVP Institute of Etiquette, is the Site Editor for Etiquipedia© Etiquette Encyclopedia