Showing posts with label Etiquette and Equality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Etiquette and Equality. Show all posts

Sunday, May 4, 2025

Etiquette and Equality

New Zealand Suffragette Political Cartoon from late 1800s 


EQUALITY 


In the qualified sense which no doubt Mr. Jefferson affixed to the term in his own mind, “all men are created free and equal.” The “noble Oracle” himself had long before as explicitly asserted the natural equality of man. In 1739, thirty-seven years before the Declaration of Independence was penned, Lord Chesterfield wrote: “We are of the same species, and no distinction whatever is between us, except that which arises from fortune. For example, your footman and Lizette would be your equals were they as rich as you. Being poor, they are obliged to serve you. Therefore you must not add to their misfortune by insulting or ill- treating them. A good heart never reminds people of their misfortune, but endeavors to alleviate, or, if possible, to make them forget it.”

The writer in Life Illustrated, quoted in a previous chapter, states the case very clearly as follows: “It is in the sacredness of their rights that men are equal. The smallest injustice done to the smallest man on earth is an offense against all men; an offense which all men have a personal and equal interest in avenging. If John Smith picks my pocket, the cause in court is correctly entitled, ‘The PEOPLE versus John Smith.’ The whole State of New York has taken up my quarrel with John, and arrays itself against John in awful majesty; because the pockets, the interests, the rights of a man are infinitely, and therefore equally, sacred. 

“The conviction of this truth is the beginning and basis of the science of republican etiquette, which acknowledges no artificial distinctions. Its leading principle is, that courtesy is due to all men from all men; from the servant to the served; from the served to the servant; and from both for precisely the same reason, namely, because both are human beings and fellow-citizens!”

From the book by Samuel R. Wells, “How to Behave, A Pocket Guide to Republican Etiquette and Guide to Correct Personal Habits,” 1856


🍽️Etiquette Enthusiast, Maura J. Graber, is the Site Editor for the Etiquipedia© Etiquette Encyclopedia

Monday, January 14, 2019

Equals in Etiquette?




(Q.) “We had a party the other night and afterward my wife chided me for lighting another woman's cigarette before her own. Since the woman was a guest, I think I did the right thing.” R. T., Boston (A.) You did, technically. However, if your wife is touchy about such matters, forget the niceties and light hers first. By the way, how pretty was the guest?– Though he wrote an etiquette column, the male columnist blasting women for the downfall of men’s manners in the 1950’s, couldn’t help himself to a joke about the guest’s appearance at the end of the Q & A.
Gals Deplore His Manners!

A favorite subject with women these days is the decline of masculine manners. For all their grievances, they forget who caused the decline. Women, that's who. 

EQUAL RIGHTS Years ago Female Eternal set out to acquire equal rights. She got them, too, in politics, education, the professions. But in the process she torpedoed Chivalry. Etiquette or that part of it governing men's actions toward women, was based on the notion that girls were frailer than boys. When girls stopped acting frailer, Etiquette took a nosedive. Men, of course, still respect women and feel protective toward them; women still want to be respected and protected. 

NOT SURE: But "equality" has wrought such confusion men aren't sure what is expected of them, and women aren't sure what to expect. Take this business of lighting a woman's cigarette. Invariably, when a man wants to show off his knowledge of etiquette, he says, piously, “When using a match, never light a woman’s cigarette before your own. The fumes, you know.” He's Wrong. The fumes from modern matches are negligible. If the man lets the match burn a second, he'll neither asphyxiate her nor blunder himself. Then there's the man who, knowing not a jot else about etiquette, knows you should ALWAYS light a woman's cigarette. Seeing one emerge from a purse, he bolts 30 feet across the room to light it. He looks foolish and she feels the same way. 

IN BOTH instances the men have good intentions. True, you should spare ladies discomfort. True, you should if convenient light ladies' cigarettes (some nonsmokers, in fact, carry matches for that express purpose). HE GOOFED! Here's a draw. It's a boner, all right, light the lady's first; ask permission to smoke in cars or other closed places; forego smoking when walking with a woman; offer her a cigarette every time you have one yourself. But, unfortunately, a blurring of roles means a blurring of rules. And men, in their bafflement, either go too far, not far enough, or abandon etiquette altogether. 

IN SOME cases, alas, equality has not only confused the roles of men and women; it has reversed them. You have, as a result, those familiar types, the Henpecked Male and Domineering Female. This unhappy switch encourages, not poor manners, but no manners. Normal women don't enjoy wearing trousers. Normal men don't enjoy being Dagwoods or Walter Mittys. So the first step toward restoring normalcy, clarifying roles and rejuvenating manners, is for men to practice those amenities that distinguish the sexes. 

Q & A on P’S & Q’S 
(Q) "We had a party the other night and afterward my wife chided me for lighting another woman's cigarette before her own. Since the woman was a guest, I think I did the right thing." R. T., Boston 
(A) You did, technically. However, if your wife is touchy about such matters, forget the niceties and light hers first. By the way, how pretty was the guest? – Don Goodwin’s Male Polish, Copyright 1959

Etiquette Enthusiast, Maura J Graber, is the Site Editor for the Etiquipedia© Etiquette Encyclopedia 

Thursday, May 12, 2016

Etiquette and Women's Rule

An 1888 painting by the Anglo-Dutch artist Sir Lawrence Alma-Tadema,"The Roses of Heliogabalus." At Roman banquets, one had to be careful and watch their manners, avoiding gossip about the Emperor, or saying anything negative about the Emperor, or anyone favored by the Emperor. The Emperor's spies were everywhere. The painting depicts the story of Emperor Heliogabalus (also known as Elagabalus), smothering his unsuspecting banquet guests to death, with rose petals, released from a false ceiling






















She is No Novelty
The question of woman's supremacy is not a new one. In Rome, under the empire, a tribunal of women was established to decide questions regarding luxury and etiquette. 

The Emperor Heliogabalus consulted this assembly frequently. They decided questions of precedence, the number and state of females at court, upon the style of carriage the emperor should ride in, whether sedan chairs should be ornamented with silver or ivory, and contested the rights of man with an intelligence worthy of the present time. It was a veritable senate of fashion, was approved of by wiser men than Heliogabalus, and was re-established and maintained by his successors. 

The admission of woman's right to govern does not always signify an advanced state of society, as will be seen from the following account of a small state in Java, between the towns of Samarang and Bantam, known as The Kingdom of Bantam. 

In regard to its form of government and the manners and customs of its inhabitants, it far exceeds the wildest dreams of feminine minds. From time immemorial Bantam, though tributary to Holland, has been governed by women. The sovereign is a man, but the fact scarcely counts, as he is subject to a council of three women. 

High dignitaries, officers, and all the court attendants are, without exception, women, who see that the men are employed in agriculture and commerce. The King's bodyguard is composed of a corps of women soldiers, who ride astride their horses like men and handle a short, sharp lance with dexterity. They carry a rifle, too, with ease, and aim and fire with accuracy at full gallop. The oldest son of the King succeeds to the crown, but if the King dies without male heirs, 100 women, specially appointed, meet and select one of their own sons by vote and proclaim him the legitimate sovereign. 

In several villages of Finland, the woman has authority, for a religious sect exists there whose disciples are forced, when about to marry, to take a vow to submit to the wife in all things. The women choose one woman for their governing head, whose duty it is to see that the men behave themselves, and to punish them if they transgress. — Pacific Rural Press, 1895



Etiquette Enthusiast, Maura J Graber, is that Site Editor for the Etiquipedia© Etiquette Encyclopedia

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Etiquette – Duties, Opinions, Privacy, Equality

It’s one’s duty to to use good manners as those do around you. – “… if you can not adapt your dress and manners to the company in which you find yourself, the sooner you take your leave the better. You may and should endeavor, in a proper way, to change such customs and fashions as you may deem wrong, or injurious in their tendency, but, in the mean time, you have no right to violate them. You may choose your company, but, having chosen it, you must conform to its rules ‘til you can change them. You are not compelled to reside in Rome; but if you choose to live there, you must ‘do as the Romans do.’ The rules which should govern your conduct, as an isolated individual, were such a thing as isolation possible in the midst of society, are modified by your relations to those around you.” 



Etiquette and Our Duties 

Out of rights grow duties; the first of which is to live an honest, truthful, self-loyal life, acting and speaking always and everywhere in accordance with the laws of our being, as revealed in our own physical and mental organization. It is by the light of this fact that we must look upon all social requirements, whether in dress, manners, or morals. All that is fundamental and genuine in these will be found to harmonize with universal principles, and consequently with our primary duty in reference to ourselves. 

1. The Senses

Whenever and wherever we come in contact with our fellow-men, there arises a question of rights, and consequently of duties. We have alluded incidentally to some of them, in speaking of habits and dress. The senses of each individual have their rights, and it is your duty to respect them. The eye has a claim upon you for so much of beauty in form, color, arrangement, position, and movement as you are able to present to it. A French author has written a book, the aim of which is to show that it is the duty of a pretty woman to look pretty. It is the duty of all women, and all men too, to look and behave just as well as they can, and whoever fails in this, fails in good manners and in duty. 
Is it the ‘duty of a pretty girl to be pretty’? A Frenchman thought so at the time. 

The ear demands agreeable tones and harmonious combinations of tones—pleasant words and sweet songs. If you indulge in loud talking, in boisterous and untimely laughter, or in profane or vulgar language, or sing out of tune, you violate its rights and offend good manners. The sense of smell requires pleasant odors for its enjoyment. Fragrance is its proper element. To bring the fetid odor of unwashed feet or filthy garments, or the stench of bad tobacco or worse whisky, or the offensive scent of onions or garlics within its sphere, is an act of impoliteness. The sense of taste asks for agreeable flavors, and has a right to the best we can give in the way of palatable foods and drinks. The sense of feeling, though less cultivated and not so sensitive as the others, has its rights too, and is offended by too great coarseness, roughness, and hardness. It has a claim on us for a higher culture. 

2. The Faculties

And if the senses have their rights, we must admit that the higher faculties and feelings of our nature are at least equally dowered in this respect. You can not trespass upon one of them without a violation of good manners. We can not go into a complete exposition of the "bill of rights" of each. You can analyze them for yourself, and learn the nature of their claims upon you. In the mean time, we will touch upon a point or two here and there.
Norman Rockwell and Freedom of Worship 

3. Opinions

Each person has a right to his or her opinions, and to the expression of them on proper occasions, and there is no duty more binding upon us all than the most complete and respectful toleration. The author of "The Illustrated Manners Book" truly says: "Every denial of, or interference with, the personal freedom or absolute rights of another, is a violation of good manners. He who presumes to censure me for my religious belief, or want of belief; who makes it a matter of criticism or reproach that I am a Theist or Atheist, Trinitarian or Unitarian, Catholic or Protestant, Pagan or Christian, Jew, Mohammedan, or Mormon, is guilty of rudeness and insult. If any of these modes of belief make me intolerant or intrusive, he may resent such intolerance or repel such intrusion; but the basis of all true politeness and social enjoyment is the mutual tolerance of personal rights." 
No snooping or peeping in keyholes

4. The Sacredness of Privacy

Here is another passage from the author just quoted which is so much to the point that we can not forbear to copy it: "One of the rights most commonly trespassed upon constituting a violent breach of good manners, is the right of privacy, or of the control of one's own person and affairs. There are places in this country where there exists scarcely the slightest recognition of this right. A man or woman bolts into your house without knocking. No room is sacred unless you lock the door, and an exclusion would be an insult. Parents intrude upon children, and children upon parents. The husband thinks he has a right to enter his wife's room, and the wife would feel injured if excluded, by night or day, from her husband's. It is said that they even open each other's letters, and claim, as a right, that neither should have any secrets from the other. "It in difficult to conceive of such a state of intense barbarism in a civilized country, such a denial of the simplest and most primitive rights, such an utter absence of delicacy and good manners; and had we not been assured on good authority that such things existed, we should consider any suggestions respecting them needless and impertinent. 

"Each person in a dwelling should, if possible, have a room as sacred from intrusion as the house is to the family. No child, grown to years of discretion, should be outraged by intrusion. No relation, however intimate, can justify it. So the trunks, boxes, packets, papers, and letters of every individual, locked or unlocked, sealed or unsealed, are sacred. It is ill manners even to open a book-case, or to read a written paper lying open, without permission expressed or implied. Books in an open case or on a center-table, cards in a card-case, and newspapers, are presumed to be open for examination. Be careful where you go, what you read, and what you handle, particularly in private apartments." This right to privacy extends to one's business, his personal relations, his thoughts, and his feelings. Don't intrude; and always "mind your own business," which means, by implication, that you must let other people's business alone. 
The longer we pose, the more I can look down and read her letter... 
 
5. Conformity

You must conform, to such an extent as not to annoy and give offense, to the customs, whether in dress or other matters, of the circle in which you move. This conformity is an implied condition in the social compact. It is a practical recognition of the right of others, and shows merely a proper regard for their opinions and feelings. If you can not sing in tune with the rest, or on the same key, remain silent. You may be right and the others wrong but that does not alter the case. Convince them, if you can, and bring them to your pitch, but never mar even a low accord. 

So if you can not adapt your dress and manners to the company in which you find yourself, the sooner you take your leave the better. You may and should endeavor, in a proper way, to change such customs and fashions as you may deem wrong, or injurious in their tendency, but, in the mean time, you have no right to violate them. You may choose your company, but, having chosen it, you must conform to its rules til you can change them. You are not compelled to reside in Rome; but if you choose to live there, you must "do as the Romans do." The rules which should govern your conduct, as an isolated individual, were such a thing as isolation possible in the midst of society, are modified by your relations to those around you. 

This life of ours is a complex affair, and our greatest errors arise from our one-side views of it. We are sovereign individuals, and are born with certain "inalienable rights;" but we are also members of that larger individual society, and our rights can not conflict with the duties which grow out of that relation. If by means of our non-conformity we cause ourselves to be cut off, like an offending hand, or plucked out, like an offending eye, our usefulness is at once destroyed. It is related of a certain king that on a particular occasion he turned his tea into his saucer, contrary to his custom and to the etiquette of society, because two country ladies, whose hospitalities he was enjoying, did so. That king was a gentleman; and this anecdote serves to illustrate an important principle; namely, that true politeness and genuine good manners often not only permit, but absolutely demand, a violation of some of the arbitrary rules of etiquette. The highest law demands complete HARMONY in all spheres and in all relations. 

New Zealand Suffragette Political Cartoon from late 1800s 

EQUALITY ~

In the qualified sense which no doubt Mr. Jefferson affixed to the term in his own mind, "all men are created free and equal." The "noble Oracle" himself had long before as explicitly asserted the natural equality of man. In 1739, thirty-seven years before the Declaration of Independence was penned, Lord Chesterfield wrote: "We are of the same species, and no distinction whatever is between us, except that which arises from fortune. For example, your footman and Lizette would be your equals were they as rich as you. Being poor, they are obliged to serve you. Therefore you must not add to their misfortune by insulting or ill- treating them. A good heart never reminds people of their misfortune, but endeavors to alleviate, or, if possible, to make them forget it." 

The writer in Life Illustrated, quoted in a previous chapter, states the case very clearly as follows: "It is in the sacredness of their rights that men are equal. The smallest injustice done to the smallest man on earth is an offense against all men; an offense which all men have a personal and equal interest in avenging. If John Smith picks my pocket, the cause in court is correctly entitled, 'The PEOPLE versus John Smith.' The whole State of New York has taken up my quarrel with John, and arrays itself against John in awful majesty; because the pockets, the interests, the rights of a man are infinitely, and therefore equally, sacred. 
 
“The conviction of this truth is the beginning and basis of the science of republican etiquette, which acknowledges no artificial distinctions. Its leading principle is, that courtesy is due to all men from all men; from the servant to the served; from the served to the servant; and from both for precisely the same reason, namely, because both are human beings and fellow-citizens!”


From the book "How to Behave, A Pocket Guide to Republican Etiquette and Guide to Correct Personal Habits"

Etiquette Enthusiast, Maura J. Graber, is the Site Editor for the Etiquipedia© Etiquette Encyclopedia